Relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and disease activity among women with systemic lupus erythematosus in Korea: a cross-sectional study

Article information

J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2025;27(1):126-132
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 February 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.25.009
1College of Nursing, Health and Nursing Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
2Department of Urology, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
3Department of Rheumatology, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
Corresponding author: Hyo Jeong Song College of Nursing, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehakno, Jeju 63243, Korea Tel: +82-64-754-3885 Fax: +82-64-702-2686 E-mail: hjsong@jejunu.ac.kr
Received 2025 January 18; Revised 2025 February 9; Accepted 2025 February 9.

Abstract

Purpose

Bladder involvement in the disease course of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is uncommon; in fact, it has been shown that patients with SLE have lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) than the general population. This study aimed to identify LUTS and the relationship between LUTS and disease activity among women with SLE.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used structured self-administered questionnaires. We recruited 110 women with SLE from the outpatient clinic of a university hospital between January and August of 2020. LUTS was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score, and disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire.

Results

Fifty-seven women (51.8%) reported urinary incontinence (UI), while 53 (48.2%) reported no UI. The mean LUTS score was 7.75 ± 5.74 (range 0-35). The scores for the seven LUTS components (range 0-5) were as follows: frequency (1.51 ± 1.48), nocturia (1.46 ± 1.07), urgency (1.27 ± 1.35), incomplete emptying (1.09 ± 1.15), intermittency (0.97 ± 1.27), weak stream (0.94 ± 1.04), and straining (0.51 ± 0.91). LUTS were positively correlated with the disease activity of SLE (r = .48, p < .001), indicating that higher LUTS scores were associated with severe disease activity.

Conclusion

The prevalence of UI was high, and LUTS (frequency, nocturia, and urgency) were common. Therefore, regular assessment and appropriate management of UI and LUTS among women with SLE are necessary, and it is also essential to keep the disease activity of SLE at a low level due to the positive relationship between disease activity and LUTS.

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (either SLE or lupus) is an autoimmune disease in which circulating autoantibodies and immune complexes invade multiple body organs, including the joints, skin, brain, cardiovascular system, lungs, and kidneys, causing chronic inflammation and tissue damage. Unpredictable flares and remissions characterize SLE through a chronic disease course [1].

Approximately 3.4 million individuals worldwide have been diagnosed with SLE, of whom approximately 3 million are women [2]. Within Asia, the lupus prevalence ranges from 26.5–103 per 100,000 individuals [3]. According to the National Health Insurance database, the annual prevalence of SLE in Korea increased slightly from 21.25/100,000 people in 2005 to 35.45/100,000 people in 2015. From 2005 to 2015, the incidence of SLE among women was 6- to 8-fold higher than that among men [4].

SLE often progresses to urinary tract disease, most commonly nephritis, due to the deposition of immune complexes in the renal glomeruli. Fibrosis and thinning of the bladder wall led to a gradual decrease in bladder capacity and obstructive uropathy symptoms [5]. Although the pathological cause or mechanism of lupus cystitis is not yet clearly understood, histopathological studies suggest a possible role of immune complex-mediated small vessel vasculitis [6]. Lupus cystitis symptoms include lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as urgency, frequency, dysuria, and nocturia, as well as pain or discomfort in the suprapubic region, and it is known that when it progresses, it causes permanent bladder dysfunction and irreversible renal dysfunction as significant complications [7]. Haarala et al. [5] conducted a study on LUTS patients that showed a higher prevalence rate than the general population; thus, it was reported that autoimmune disorders owing to lupus can affect the bladder. In a study on urinary disorders in women with SLE, Yu et al. [6] showed that frequency, urgency, weak stream, residual urine, and severe LUTS were significantly higher among SLE women than in the healthy control group. In a study on the urinary function of ten patients with SLE, Duran-Barragan et al. [8] showed that most patients had urgency, frequency, nocturia, and bladder pain, and their urodynamic tests showed characteristics such as decreased bladder capacity and decreased bladder sensation. As such, SLE patients experienced a high prevalence of urinary problems, and the degree of symptoms has been observed to be more severe than in the general population. In addition, musculoskeletal damage occurring during SLE disease can damage the pelvic floor muscles and affect the development of LUTS [9]. Still, the prevalence is not yet well known, and awareness of its importance in management is low compared to other symptom management. LUTS are often overlooked but can significantly impact an individual's quality of life [10]. Therefore, regular assessment and examination of urinary tracts in SLE patients can detect LUTS and urinary voiding dysfunction early, which can be an essential opportunity for appropriate care and treatment.

SLE disease activity significantly impacts subsequent organ damage and quality of life. It has been reported that when lupus' low disease activity state is well maintained, it is associated with significant protection from disease relapses, irreversible organ damage, mortality, and deterioration of quality of life [11]. The disease activity of SLE may affect LUTS. Yu et al. [6] also reported that the higher the disease activity, the more serious the urinary symptoms are.

Therefore, this study aimed to identify the prevalence of LUTS among women with SLE and the relationship between SLE disease activity and LUTS.

METHODS

1. Study design

This cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the prevalence of LUTS among women with SLE and to determine the relationship between SLE disease activity and LUTS.

2. Participants

The participants of this study were women aged ≥ 18 years who had been diagnosed with SLE and had been visiting the hospital outpatient clinic for > 6 months and receiving treatment regularly. The number of participants was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.9.2 program [12], and the minimum number of participants was 109 based on the two-tailed test for correlation, with a medium effect size of .30, significance level of .05, and power of .90 [13]. After excluding one participant with insufficient questionnaire data, there were 110 participants. The selection criteria for participants were those who understood the purpose of the study and gave written consent to participate.

3. Instruments

1) General and disease-related characteristics

General and disease-related characteristics included age, education level, living with spouse, body mass index (BMI, m2/kg) using self-reported height and weight, drinking, smoking, alcohol consumption, disease duration, and comorbid disease.

2) LUTS

The definition of LUTS was systematized by the International Continence Society (ICS) in 2002 to include all urinary symptoms and is used worldwide. Urinary incontinence (UI) is included as one of the LUTS to the bladder storage problem of overall LUTS. but it is named UI and LUTS depending on the measurement tool [14].

UI was queried based on the ICS definition (the complaint of involuntary urine leakage). Within this study, UI was operationally defined as a report of involuntary urine leakage less than once a month or more frequently during the three months before data collection. Stress UI (SUI) refers to involuntary urinary leakage during exertion, exercise, laughing, coughing, or sneezing. In contrast, urge UI (UUI) refers to urinary leakage before reaching the toilet accompanied by urgency. Mixed UI (MUI) refers to cases where symptoms of both SUI and UUI were reported [14-16].

LUTS were measured using a Korean translation of the International Prostate Symptom Score instrument [17]. LUTS have seven sub-symptoms: incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, hesitancy, and nocturia. The score scale for each sub-symptom is 0 points for ‘never,’ 1 point for ‘rarely (one out of five times),’ 2 points for ‘sometimes (one or two out of five times),’ 3 points for ‘approximately half of the time (two or three out of five times),’ 4 points for ‘more than half of the time (three or four out of five times),’ and 5 points for ‘always.’ Regarding LUTS experienced by the participant in the past three months, each lower symptom score ranges from 0–5 points, and the total LUTS score, consisting of 7, ranges from 0~35 points. The tool's reliability for measuring LUTS in women and men was found to be Cronbach's α = .80 [18], and in this study, the reliability was Cronbach's α = .81.

3) Disease activity

Disease activity was measured using the SLE Disease Activity Questionnaire developed by Karlson et al. [19]. This tool consists of 24 self-report questions about symptoms experienced in the past three months and one question about overall disease activity. This study used a 24-item symptom scale including weight loss, fatigue, fevers, oral ulcers, malar rash, photosensitivity, vasculitis, other rashes, alopecia, lymphadenopathy, dyspnea, chest pain, Raynaud’s phenomenon, abdominal pain, paresthesia, seizures, stroke, memory loss, depression, headaches, myalgias, muscle weakness, arthralgias, and joint swelling. The score for each symptom ranges from 0 (not at all difficult) to a maximum of 3 (severely difficult), and each symptom is weighted according to the scoring method proposed by Karlson et al. [19]. The total score ranges from 0 to 47, with a higher score indicating higher disease activity. The tool's reliability was Cronbach's α = .85 in a large observational cohort study [20], and the tool's reliability was Cronbach's α = .87 in the present study.

4. Data collection

This study collected data using a self-report questionnaire from patients who regularly visited Jeju National University Hospital in Jeju City for lupus treatment and management from January to August 2020. First, approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics review committee, and permission was obtained to collect data from institutional officials. The researcher explained this study's purpose and the questionnaire's contents to patients waiting to see an outpatient clinic. If they met the research subject criteria, they received written consent for participation in the study and then administered the self-report questionnaire. The questionnaire took approximately 15 minutes to complete.

5. Data analysis

The data was analyzed using the SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). According to the characteristics, LUTS were analyzed using independent t-tests and ANOVA. The relationship between LUTS and SLE disease activity was calculated using Pearson correlation.

6. Ethical considerations

This study was conducted after an ongoing regular review by the Jeju National Hospital Institutional Review Board (approval number: JEJUNUH 2019-09-010-002). The purpose of the study, procedures, information on anonymity and confidentiality, contact information for the researcher, and the right to refuse participation at any time during the study were clearly stated in the consent form. We explained the purpose and method of the study to the participant sufficiently and then obtained the patient's voluntary consent and signature. The collected data were processed anonymously to protect the participant's identity, and the questionnaire data were stored in a locker accessible only to the researcher to ensure confidentiality. After the study, the researcher stored the data for the period designated by the Research Ethics Review Committee and then destroyed it.

RESULTS

1. Participant characteristics

In this study, 110 women with SLE participated. The mean age was 44.74 ± 14.07 years, with 65.5% under 50 ranging from 18–75 years. 53.6% had a college and an over education level, and 63.6% lived with a spouse. Employment was reported by 58.7%. In addition, 34.9% consumed alcohol, whereas 11.0% were current smokers. The mean BMI was 23.39 ± 4.47 kg/m2, with 26.4% of the participants having a 25 kg/m2 or higher BMI. The mean disease duration was 157.61 ± 107.83 months; 44.5% of women had 120 months or less. 48.2% had a comorbid condition. The disease activity mean score was 12.84 ± 8.37 (Table 1).

General and Disease-related Characteristics of the Participants (N = 110)

2. UI and LUTS

Fifty-seven subjects (51.8%) reported UI. The majority of reported types of UI were SUI (33.6%), MUI (16.4%), followed by UUI (1.8%), and no UI (48.2%). Among women with UI, the prevalence of UI was ‘less than once monthly’ 22.7%, ‘one or several times monthly’ 17.3%, ‘one or several times weekly’ 8.2%, and ‘daily’ 3.6% (Table 2).

Distribution of Urinary Incontinence and Type (N = 110)

The mean score for LUTS among the women was 7.75 ± 5.74. Each LUTS symptom score was as follows: urinary frequency, 1.51; nocturia, 1.46; urgency, 1.27; and incomplete emptying, 1.09 (Table 3).

The Mean Score for Each Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (N = 110)

3. LUTS based on participant characteristics

There was no statistically significant difference in LUTS according to the characteristics of women with SLE (Table 4).

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms by General and Disease-related Characteristics (N = 110)

4. Association between LUTS and disease activity

The relationship between LUTS and disease activity showed a statistically significant correlation (r = .48, p < .001); this indicates that the higher the LUTS scores, the more severe the disease activity is (Table 5).

Correlation between Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Disease Activity

DISCUSSION

UI is defined by ICS 2002 or International Urogynecological Association/ICS 2010 as the involuntary loss of urine. It includes UUI, SUI, or MUI [21]. Based on the UI definition by ICS, the prevalence of UI in this study was high at 51.8%, and the types of UI were SUI 33.6%, MUI 16.4%, and UUI 1.8%. In the study of Abushamma et al. [22], which targeted 89 women with the same type of rheumatoid arthritis, the prevalence of SUI was high at 40.4% and UUI at 30.3%. When comparing these results with the women in this study, the UUI level was lower. However, since there were very few studies investigating UI, there were limitations in comparing and discussing the results of this UI with those of previous studies. In SLE patients, UI may develop from direct inflammation and damage to the bladder wall and neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to SLE nervous system involvement [7,23]. Furthermore, SLE can affect pelvic floor muscles [24], which may involve stress and other UI and its risk factors. For this reason, we have assessed UI using symptom questionnaires to examine UI and its patterns, revealing a high prevalence of UI among women with SLE in this study. Therefore, it is important to evaluate further diagnostic tests to identify the UI and UI patterns because the cause, management, and proper treatment differ depending on the UI type and severity.

In this study, LUTS of SLE women showed the highest score of frequency, and nocturia and urgency were high, with storage LUTS predominating. This result showed a similar pattern to the LUTS symptoms of the study of Yu et al. [6]. On the other hand, the results of the study by Sakakibara et al. [23], which performed to evaluate LUTS and urodynamic tests on SLE patients with neurological disorders, showed various and severe voiding symptoms such as voiding difficulty, decreased urine flow, increased maximal urethral closure pressure, bladder hypersensitivity, impaired bladder contractility, and impaired bladder-sphincteric coordination.

SLE disease affects various body parts, symptoms vary from patient to patient, and the course of the disease is not constant even in one patient. Therefore, LUTS and voiding dysfunction due to SLE can vary from individual to individual, so a comprehensive symptom assessment focused on individuals is needed to be approached.

Existing literature highlights the complex relationship between disease activity and urinary symptoms [25]. The significant positive correlation between SLE disease activity and LUTS observed in this study indicates that the higher LUTS scores showed severe disease activity. Similar results were reported by Yu et al. [6], who showed that severe disease activity in SLE women had higher LUTS. Additional studies should be conducted to elucidate the mechanism or pathology of bladder involvement, urinary symptoms, or disorders due to SLE.

This study assessed UI and LUTS in women with SLE and found that they experience them at high levels. In addition, by identifying the positive relationship between LUTS and disease activity, it is necessary to develop nursing interventions to maintain the disease activity of SLE at a low level. The limitations of this study include the insufficient number of subjects, including women with SLE who visited a university hospital, and the reliance on subjective symptom questionnaires. In addition, this study was limited to a single area in a city; there are limitations in generalizing the results to the entire population.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the prevalence of UI in women with SLE was high, and LUTS was predominant in the order of frequency, nocturia, and urgency. The more severe the disease activity, the higher the LUTS. Management to maintain a low level of disease activity owing to SLE is emphasized, which can prevent conditions that may trigger or worsen LUTS. Future studies are required to determine how UI and LUTS influence quality of life. In addition, regular examination of urinary function and appropriate management by medical personnel are essential.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

AUTHORSHIP

HJS, YJK, and JK contributed to the conception and design of this study; HJS and JK collected data; HJS performed the statistical analysis and interpretation; HJS drafted the manuscript; HJS, YJK, and JK critically revised the manuscript; HJS, YJK, and JK supervised the whole study process. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FUNDING

This research was supported by the 2023 scientific promotion program funded by Jeju National University.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. Hoi A, Igel T, Mok CC, Arnaud L. Systemic lupus erythematosus. The Lancet 2024;403(10441):2326–2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00398-2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00398-2. 38642569.
2. Tian J, Zhang D, Yao X, Huang Y, Lu Q. Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comprehensive systematic analysis and modelling study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2023;82(3):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223035. 10.1136/ard-2022-223035. 36241363.
3. Barber MR, Drenkard C, Falasinnu T, Hoi A, Mak A, Kow NY, et al. Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 2021;17(9):515–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00668-1. 10.1038/s41584-021-00668-1. 34345022.
4. Bae EH, Lim SY, Han KD, Jung JH, Choi HS, Kim HY, et al. Trend of prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in South Korea, 2005 to 2015: a nationwide population-based study. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2020;35(3):652–661. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.303.
5. Haarala M, Alanen A, Hietarinta M, Kiilholma P. Lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with Sjögren's syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. International Urogynecology Journal 2000;11(2):84–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920050075. 10.1007/s001920050075. 10805264.
6. Yu HJ, Lee WC, Lee KL, Chen MY, Chen CY, Chen J. Voiding dysfunction in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2004;50(1):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11431. 10.1002/art.11431. 14730613.
7. Santacruz JC, Pulido S, Arzuaga A, Mantilla MJ, Londono J. Lupus cystitis, from myth to reality: a narrative review. Cureus 2021;13(12)e20409. https://doi.org/ 10.7759/cureus.20409. 10.7759/cureus.20409. 35047251.
8. Duran-Barragan S, Ruvalcaba-Naranjo H, Rodriguez-Gutierrez L, Solano-Moreno H, Hernandez-Rios G, Sanchez-Ortiz A, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections and bladder dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2008;17(12):1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203308093458. 10.1177/0961203308093458. 19029280.
9. Bifani BE, Sato TO, Dos Santos GB, Serrão PRMDS, Rocha APR, Carvalho C. Pelvic floor dysfunctions in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. International Urogynecology Journal 2023;34(5):1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05310-6. 10.1007/s00192-022-05310-6. 35913612.
10. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA 2017;318(16):1592–1604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.12137. 10.1001/jama.2017.12137. 29067433.
11. Golder V, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Li N, Louthrenoo W, Chen YH, Cho J, et al. Association of sustained lupus low disease activity state with improved outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a multinational prospective cohort study. The Lancet Rheumatology 2024;6(8):e528–e536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00121-8. 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00121-8. 38876129.
12. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009;41(4):1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. 19897823.
13. Park AR. A study on nursing student’s biomedical ethics and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Korean Health and Fundamental Medical Science 2021;14(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.37152/kmhs.2021.14.1.24. 10.37152/kmhs.2021.14.1.24.
14. Van Kerrebroeck P, Abrams P, Chaikin D, Donovan J, Fonda D, Jackson S, et al. The standardization of terminology in nocturia: report from the standardization subcommittee of the International Continence Society. BJU International 2002;90(Suppl 3):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.90.s3.3.x. 10.1046/j.1464-410x.90.s3.3.x. 12445092.
15. Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 1993;47(6):497–499. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.47.6.497. 10.1136/jech.47.6.497. 8120507.
16. Song HJ, Bluhm MDL, Lee M, Kim HJ, Moon HS. The relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and osteoarthritis symptoms among vendors in a conventional market. International Neurourology Journal 2022;26(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2142146.073. 10.5213/inj.2142146.073. 34922425.
17. Choi HR, Chung WS, Shim BS, Kwon SW, Hong SJ, Chung BH, et al. Translation validity and reliability of I-PSS Korean version. Korean Journal of Urology 1996;37:659–665.
18. Okamura K, Nojiri Y, Osuga Y, Tange C. Psychometric analysis of international prostate symptom score for female lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 2009;73(6):1199–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.054. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.054. 19371926.
19. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Rivest C, Ramsey-Goldman R, Wright EA, Partridge AJ, et al. Validation of a systemic lupus activity questionnaire (SLAQ) for population studies. Lupus 2003;12(4):280–286. https://doi.org/10.1191/0961203303lu332oa. 10.1191/0961203303lu332oa. 12729051.
20. Okamoto Y, Katsumata Y, Baba S, Kawaguchi Y, Gono T, Hanaoka M, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire that includes physician-based assessments in a large observational cohort. Lupus 2016;25(5):486–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203315617844. 10.1177/0961203315617844. 26589578.
21. Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2017;36(5):1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23124. 10.1002/nau.23124. 27917521.
22. Abushamma F, Nassar N, Najjar SO, Hijaze SM, Koni A, Zyoud SH, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms among females with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cross-sectional study. International Journal of General Medicine 2021;14:8427–8435. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S333423. 10.2147/IJGM.S333423. 34819750.
23. Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Yoshiyama M, Yamanishi T, Hattori T. Urinary dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosis. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2003;22(6):593–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10126. 10.1002/nau.10126. 12951670.
24. Di Matteo A, Smerilli G, Cipolletta E, Wakefield RJ, De Angelis R, Risa AM, et al. Muscle involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: multimodal ultrasound assessment and relationship with physical performance. Rheumatology 2022;61(12):4775–4785. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac196. 10.1093/rheumatology/keac196. 35333315.
25. Liberski S, Marczak D, Mazur E, Miętkiewicz K, Leis K, Gałązka P. Systemic lupus erythematosus of the urinary tract: focus on lupus cystitis. Reumatologia 2018;56(4):255–258. https://doi.org/10.5114/reu m.2018.77978. 10.5114/reu m.2018.77978. 30237631.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

General and Disease-related Characteristics of the Participants (N = 110)

Characteristics Categories n (%) M ± SD
Age (yr) ≤ 50 72 (65.5) 44.74 ± 14.07
> 50 38 (35.5)
Educational level ≤ High school 51 (46.4)
College and over 59 (53.6)
Living with spouse No 40 (36.4)
Yes 70 (63.6)
Employment No  45 (41.3)
Yes 64 (58.7)
Alcohol intake No 71 (65.1)
Yes 38 (34.9)
Smoking No 97 (89.0)
Yes 12 (11.0)
Body mass index (kg/m2) < 25 81 (73.6) 23.39 ± 4.47
≥ 25 29 (26.4)
Duration of disease (mon) ≤ 120 49 (44.5) 157.61 ± 107.83
> 120 61 (55.5)
Comorbid disease No 57 (51.8)
Yes 53 (48.2)
Disease activity 12.84 ± 8.37 (Range: 0~47)

M = Mean; SD = Standard deviation.

Total number of participants do not match that of the respondents.

Table 2.

Distribution of Urinary Incontinence and Type (N = 110)

Characteristics n (%)
UI 57 (51.8)
SUI 37 (33.6)
UUI 2 (1.8)
MUI 18 (16.4)
Continence 53 (48.2)
UI frequency (Frequency of experiencing UI) Less than once monthly 25 (22.7)
One or several times monthly 19 (17.3)
One or several times weekly 9 (8.2)
Daily and/or nightly 4 (3.6)
None 53 (48.2)

UI = Urinary incontinence; SUI = Stress urinary incontinence; UUI = Urge urinary incontinence; MUI = Mixed urinary incontinence.

Table 3.

The Mean Score for Each Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (N = 110)

Characteristics Categories M ± SD Range
LUTS Frequency 1.51 ± 1.48 0~5
Nocturia 1.46 ± 1.07 0~5
Urgency 1.27 ± 1.35 0~5
Incomplete emptying 1.09 ± 1.15 0~5
Intermittency 0.97 ± 1.27 0~5
Weak stream 0.94 ± 1.04 0~5
Straining 0.51 ± 0.91 0~5
Total 7.75 ± 5.74 0~35

M = Mean; SD = Standard deviation; LUTS = Lower urinary tract symptoms.

Table 4.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms by General and Disease-related Characteristics (N = 110)

Characteristics Categories LUTS
M ± SD t or F p
Age (yr) ≤ 50 7.64 ± 6.08 −0.29 .772
> 50 7.97 ± 5.11
Education level High school or below 7.96 ± 0.11 0.34 .734
College or higher other tertiary education 7.58 ± 4.75
Living with spouse No 7.08 ± 5.06 −0.94 .350
Yes 8.14 ± 6.09
Employment No  7.40 ± 5.57 0.63 .527
Yes 8.11 ± 6.74
Alcohol intake No 8.13 ± 6.67 0.77 .442
Yes 7.24 ± 5.66
Smoking No 7.30 ± 5.12 −1.88 .085
Yes 12.00 ± 8.50
Body mass index (㎏/m2) < 25 7.73 ± 5.97 −0.08 .937
≥ 25 7.83 ± 5.13
Duration of disease (mon) ≤ 120 7.29 ± 5.51 −0.77 .445
> 120 8.13 ± 6.76
Comorbid diseases No 6.91 ± 5.73 −1.58 .117
Yes 8.66 ± 6.79

M = Mean; SD = Standard deviation; LUTS = Lower urinary tract symptoms.

Table 5.

Correlation between Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Disease Activity

Variables Disease activity
r (p)
LUTS .48 (< .001)

LUTS = Lower urinary tract symptoms.